Texas and Florida have the highest number of books challenged at school district level.
Texas and Florida have the highest number of school districts challenging books. States in the eastern half of the US generally have a higher number of school districts challenging books.
Louisiana's libraries have the most instances of books being challenged or banned. Compared to school districts, there are fewer cases of books in public libraries being challenged, though still significant.
In addition, Krause requested a list of books from school districts which address or contain the following topics: "human sexuality, sexually transmitted diseases, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), sexually explicit images, graphic presentations of sexual behavior that is in violation of the law."
He requested to be informed of the universe of content that "might make students feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress because of their race or sex or convey that a student, by virtue of their race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously."
As challenges to books increase, Fernandes is keen to find a resolution for book bans that investigates the attraction students feel towards certain texts and supports them as they consume them.
In the current school year alone, which is yet to end, the highest number of challenges in any school district is 623, already 1.4 times the highest in the most recent full school year.
“My philosophy both back home and here is that, in any case, students are accessing anything that's remotely taboo. Or if you've banned it, you're making people talk about it, all the more. So they're going to be reading it online. They're going to be watching stuff they're not going to watch so I much prefer to give little openings or platforms in which we can discuss it and discuss what is controversial about it,” says Fernandes.
“Through the TV show Thirteen Reasons Why and the book, they realized, look, students are going to be reading it anyway. So what can we as teachers do, we can give them a space that they can talk about it? Again, we're not vouching or we're not like legitimizing it. But it's inevitable that students are going to be reading whatever is the latest, whatever is drawing the most attention,” she adds.
“Everything can be disturbing or provocative to one person or the other. But it's whether the English teacher should be held culpable or responsible for a student's reaction to a text. So yeah, so I make it like a dialogue between my students and their families as well, some of the acid, choose a book, talk to your parents about whether it's appropriate or not, whether it's at your reading level. Some mature readers can handle a lot,” says Fernandes.
Globally, the banning of books in some countries could be much less formal than is the case in the United States.
In India, for instance, the knowledge of secrets is part of the currency necessary for buying the books.
“There is like an illicit understanding with booksellers, if you ask them for it, they always have a few copies at the back, and they will give it to you. So there's no books that are that we cannot buy from a bookshop in India,” says Fernandes.
Additionally, online access continues to be available via platforms such as Amazon and Libgen where students can access PDFs of books.
In the last a hundred years, India has banned the highest number of specific books worldwide, but Indonesia had banned all Chinese literature
In the last a hundred years, India has banned the highest number of specific books worldwide
Each box is a book.
On the global stage, though book banning is certainly a controversial topic, within the last century, just as many books have been banned in recent years as at the beginning of the century.
About just as many books are being banned today as at the beginning of the last century.
Each rectangle is a book.
But even though the numbers of books banned in different epochs within the last century are generally constant, there is still a trend in terms of time, that is, that the definition of what is shocking shifts.
“I give my students a 1930s short story to read by Ismat Chughtai. She's writing from a very conservative Islamic household. And she's talking about same sex desire in the 1930s in India. When I did it in my undergrad I, I found it quite shocking. And I give it to my students, they don't bat an eyelid. They’re like, 'Miss, may we please show you what we're reading right now?' And it's a different world out there,” says Fernandes.
“So it's whether we're protecting the students or whether we're realizing that they're going to be faced with provocative challenging literature and film anywhere they go. If you see what they're watching and what they're reading online, it would absolutely shock you,” says Fernandes.
Fiction books, most prominently novels are the books banned the most over the last century, at 1.6 times the rate of books classified as nonfiction.
Each rectangle is a book.
Fiction books, particularly novels, generally more likely to be banned than non-fiction
Last year, Salman Rushdie lost sight in one eye and capacity in his hand due to an attack on him. His book has been banned in 18 countries worldwide as well as the US. Rushdie's The Satanic Verses has been banned three times as much as the second most banned book globally and nearly double the number of novels are banned compared to non-fiction books, including 67% of the 6 most banned books
Fernandes draws her philosophy on guiding adolescents through difficult texts in part from her uncle, a Muslim scholar, who she recalls said, “When you place a ban on a book, it's almost condescending, saying that you don't trust your readers to be able to discern, and to make up their minds for themselves.”
“Maybe they believe that literature, is that powerful that it can sway your belief, or it can make make you unpatriotic. Some of these groups are saying ‘No, our people need to be sheltered from the corrupting influences of literature.’ How much faith do we put on the reader to discern?’